River Nar, Castle Acre - © J Gladstone


Geo-east Logo


Site search  
 
 
Geo-conservation

 
Principles and practice

 


Geological features and landforms are subject to a range of threats, including built development, coastal engineering, landscaping and landfill, not to mention the effects of vandalism and even over-zealous fossil collecting.

1. Principles

The Earth Science Conservation Classification (ESCC) system provides a framework for understanding the differing vulnerabilities of different types of geodiversity sites and features. It classifies them as Exposure/Extensive, Integrity or Finite, and these categories are related to varying approaches to conserve them.

To find out more about the ESCC visit Natural England’s website or read ‘Geological Conservation – A guide to good practice’ by Prosser, Murphy and Larwood (English Nature 2006).


Geological features

Where geological features are concerned, some are more vulnerable than others. In the case of thick, laterally extensive deposits such as the Chalk we need to conserve access to their archival resources rather than preserve them outright. The conservation priority in this case is to maintain access points for scientific and educational study, such as exposures. However, in cases of finite deposits such, as a lens of interglacial sediment with animal bones and associated human activity or an ancient lake deposit, we need to preserve the resource in situ or, if physical preservation is not a practical option, record it fully prior to destruction (i.e. preservation by record).
 
Timworth pit lake beds. Photo © Geo-East
Significant features may temporarily be revealed by quarrying. Recording and sampling these Pleistocene lake deposits exposed deep in Timworth Quarry, Suffolk, is the only way to preserve the valuable environmental information they contain.

Landform features

Geomorphological features are more vulnerable to damage than geological exposures. They are either one-off features created in the past, or are currently active features being created by natural processes, and so can be damaged if the formative processes on which they depend are stopped or interrupted. We need to preserve the integrity of landforms and their formative processes with reference to the most natural examples.

Weston Hills Tunnel cutting Jan 05  Photo © Geo-East
The Weston Hills, Herts. Chalk strata were cut through by the A505 Baldock Bypass, and the spoil then used to reinstate the former hill profile. However the integrity of this ancient landscape feature has been permanently damaged.

Soil Features

Soils have a complex history of development often over many millennia; they are a palimpsest resulting from a range of past and present processes. Here, the conservation priority is to preserve their integrity as structured products of these processes.
 

Westleton Heath podsol. Photo © CJ Markham
A soil profile at Westleton Heath Pit, Suffolk showing the grey, bleached horizon characteristic of a podsol.

Landscape features

Landscapes are ever-evolving products of interacting cultural, biological and geological factors. However they are vulnerable to a steady erosion of their distinctive qualities and an increasing homogenisation brought about by cultural changes operating in a globalising economic context. We need to conserve their local distinctiveness and integrity by reference to statements of local character.
 

Cley next the Sea marsh. Photo © Martin Warren
The marshes at Cley next the Sea, Norfolk. This is a designated landscape, and its special qualities are conserved as being part of the Norfolk Coast AONB and the North Norfolk Coast SSSI.

Cultural features

The features of economic geology such as mines and brick kilns are part of the history of human activity. They are vulnerable to economic and industrial change, and where physical preservation is not possible preservation by record may be the most practical way to conserve their geodiversity interest.
 

Winston Brick Kiln. Photo © Geo-East
The old brick kilns at Winston, Suffolk, have been excavated and preserved by their owner.


2. Examples of geo-conservation in action

For many local geo-conservation groups in the region, slumping of sediments and vegetation overgrowth are a continual problem which prevents geological exposures from being seen and appreciated for scientific and educational study.

Thorndon C Park, Brentwood conservation work. Photo © Gerald Lucy   Chafford Gorges conservation work 2 - © Gerald Lucy
Re-exposing a section in glacial gravels at Thorndon Country Park, Brentwood, Essex.   Buddleia overgrowth on chalk cliffs at Chafford Gorges County Park, Thurrock, Essex, needs regular clearing to expose features of interest.
     
     
Sutton Chicken Pit conservation work. Photo © Geo-East   Barnham East farm pit shelter. Photo © Geo-East
Removing plant growth from an exposure of the boundary between the Pliocene Coralline Crag and Red Crag at Sutton Knoll, Suffolk.   Hoxnian interglacial deposits with Palaeolithic evidence have been excavated at East Farm Brick Pit, Barnham, Suffolk. The British Museum has erected a shelter to protect a sample of these deposits from weathering.

 


 
     

- Geo-East - East of England Geodeversity Partnership

     
Menu Bottom    

Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional
Copyright © Geo-East Partnership & geo-eat.org.uk geoeast.org.uk
| Site map | Terms of use | Privacy |
Designed and maintained by Surfs Global UK
Copyright © Surfs Global UK International Networks
Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional